Fair enough. My general intent was to show it, hopefully, for the most part, in a "different light".
If I'd come away with images, that evoked the response, "I've seen that before, boring, (yawn) yadayadayada", I'd be disappointed. :-) Thank you for taking the time to look and comment, Tom On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/7/2010 2:30 PM, Tom C wrote: >> >> Boris, >> >> Your opinions are appreciated, well maybe. :-) Compositions are >> intended, and to my memory colors are fairly accurate. Many shots >> taken several hours before noon. I deliberately isolated the >> architectural elements, in most cases providing little context. >> because to me it often looked very classical Greco-Roman in style, and >> that is what I intended to show. >> >> I was not apprehensive, why would I be? I think you reading far too >> much between the pixels. >> >> As far as my camera and I learning about one another, I don't >> understand how you arrive at that judgement. I shoot with the NEX5 >> just like any other camera, and if I found there was a large learning >> curve where I had to adjust for the performance of the camera in some >> way other than I already do, I'd chuck it >> >> Tom > > Absolutely, Tom. It was my /impression/ that I made by looking at web size > pictures on my (uncalibrated) monitor at work. It is therefore only logical > that I might have made a mistake. > > Your Greco-Roman intent did not come through to me and I went "out" trying > to read "between the pixels". > > Like I said, I am offering you my impression, not my judgment. > > Boris > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
