Pentax made a 75-150 zoom that has
SUPERB perfromance, so why settle
for a 75-100??
JCO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Help, I need advice for short and long focal lengths
>
>
> > I'd love to see more lenses like this. A 75~100/2.0 might be a
> > real pleasure to use, as might a 50~85/1.8. The shorter zoom
> > range may allow for a lighter, faster lens.
>
> The shorter zoom range may make for fewer optical compromises, too,
> Shel.
>
> The 75~100/2.0, especially, would appeal to me. It would have the
> potential of being a ~really~ nice portrait zoom. It would sort of
> be like the concept of the Tokina AT-X 60-120/2.8, only even "more
> so" (or perhaps "less so", depending on how you look at it)...
>
> [For my own personal shooting style, though, a zoom with a 50~85
> range would be less interesting (or, certainly, less often used).]
>
> Of course, all bets would be off if any of these were an AF lens
> lacking an AF/MF clutch - <ugh>.
>
> Fred
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
