----- Mensaje original ----
> De: Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com>
> Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> Enviado: mar,9 noviembre, 2010 16:03
> Asunto: Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400
>
> On 11/9/2010 4:52 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> > I guess I can see that... I find it fascinating how differently the
> > camera is perceived based upon so many variables. For me (all-green
> > images from something being broken notwithstanding) the K7 is a
> > marvelous camera and a great step up from the K10D. Weird.
>
> Charles, I think I said so a number of times, but I can repeat. The 'wow'
>factor that I >experienced going from *istD to K10D was so tremendous (for
>lack
>
>of less loud word) that it >seems to be felt even now. The click between me
>and
>
>my K10D was instant. I remember a >number of issues being discovered with the
>camera along the time. I was not moved by that at >all. I installed the Katz
>Eye screen and was very happy camper. It is really a brilliant camera. It
>>was
>very easy, actually a no-brainer not to upgrade to K20D as I did not see any
>specific >advantage over K10D except ISO range but it was said that K20D
>wasn't
>
>very noiseless either.
>
I am in the opposite ugrade path as you Boris (*ist Ds, K20D,...). So I skipped
the K10D (with great efforts) and when the K20D came out I remember that the
comments were that it had a great sensor less noisy than the K10D sensor
(there were a lot of people complaining that the 'old' 6mpix sensor was better
for low light than the K10D's 10mpix one).
And then the K-7 came out and in a few months its sensor (evolution of the
K20D's) was totally crap...¿?
(Ah...according to my path, it's time for a K-5...let's see if I manage to
resist until the summer...)
Regards,
Jaume
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
