I think he simply points out there are different reasons why a picture is considered great. More to the point, some expect of the shot (location, subject, technique, composition, etc) has to be great, not necessarily all of them.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:43 AM, CheekyGeek <cheekyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, a lot of what Miserere was saying in that article > was with tongue firmly planted in cheek. > Or maybe I just need new batteries in my sarcastometer/ironicalgraph. > > Darren Addy > Kearney, NE > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
