Really. That's sad. On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:37 PM, paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: > I could have had six 645Ds for what it cost me to save Grace from her drunken > wife-beating father and the British legal aid idiocy. > Paul > > On Dec 10, 2010, at 6:34 PM, John Francis wrote: > >> >> Well, if we're going to one-up each other: >> >> I could have got four 645Ds (with lenses) fow what we spent >> on the kitchen remodel. Then there was a problem with the >> heating which meant it was time to do the re-ducting that >> we'd been putting off for years, and a small number of old >> windows to be replaced before the tax credit ran out. That >> would have covered a couple of K-5s with grips & DA* zooms. >> >> This would have been a bit less of an issue if my wife hadn't >> been rather unexpectedly laid off from the job she's had for >> the last 12 years (the day after we'd bought her the E-PL1). >> No cause for panic, but it does mean discretionary spending >> doesn't run to four-figure toys at the moment. >> >> >> . >> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 04:56:02PM -0600, Paul Sorenson wrote: >>> I feel your pain. Some time before the end of the year we're >>> supposed to be getting new windows. That's *four* K-5s that could >>> have been under the tree. :-( >>> >>> -p >>> >>> On 12/10/2010 1:51 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >>>> Good gawd, man! How much more evidence of pure studliness do you >>>> need? The K-5 is near-perfect and everyone should have one. Put >>>> the reviews down and get out your wallet. >>>> >>>> The only reason there won't be one under my Xmas tree this year is >>>> that "we" are getting a new floor for the house. I could have >>>> bought a 645D for what that's setting us back. >>>> >>>> -bmw >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10-12-10 12:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >>>>> Not in the K20 manual.;) I hope to be reading the K-5 manual in >>>>> not too long. >>>>> Awaiting a couple more reviews and additional feed back from the PDML. >>>>> >>>>> Jack >>>>> >>>>> --- On Fri, 12/10/10, Steven Desjardins<drd1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From: Steven Desjardins<drd1...@gmail.com> >>>>>> Subject: Re: I Wish >>>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<pdml@pdml.net> >>>>>> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 9:08 AM >>>>>> Isn't there a custom setting for >>>>>> something like that? >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
