My 80mm Rodenstock F5.6 covered 6X7 no
problem when making 8X10 prints. But I
bought a 105mm 5.6 El-Nikkor just to be safe.
JCO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage
>
>
> Correction, The Fuji is a 90mm f/5.6 Fujinon. The Rodenstock is
> an 80mm f/5.6.
>
> William Robb
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Robb"
> Subject: Re: Enlarger Lens Coverage
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Collin Brendemuehl"
> > Subject: OT: Enlarger Lens Coverage
> >
> >
> > > Good news.
> > > The Fujinon 105/5.6 EP enlarging lens
> > > covers all but the very tips of a 4x5.
> > > Great lens. Great contrast.
> >
> > Aren't the Fujinons nice? I have both 50mm and 80mm Fujinons.
> > The 80mm covers the 6x7 negative quite nicely, and even the 50
> > is not too shy of covering it. I think it might cover the 645
> > format.
> > They are specatularly sharp and contrasty right to the edges
> as
> > well. Much more so that my Rodenstocks of the same focal
> > lengths.
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
