Good God, I could almost understand Esperanto, but Klingon? I'm not
even going to look, but I'll be they even include High Elvish a la Tolkien.
Jeez, we have enough nearly dead languages in the world do we really
/need/ to produce more?
On 1/23/2011 10:33 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
BTW: "Klingon" is currently included in the "Best Common Practices
#47" language tagging standards. See
http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp47.txt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IETF_language_tag
for more info and
http://source.icu-project.org/repos/icu/icu/trunk/source/data/lang/en.txt
for the current list of codes to language names (in English). The
recommendation poses "tlh" to be the standard tag code for Klingon.
K'Plaah!
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Cotty<cotty...@mac.com> wrote:
On 23/1/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Do you have a Klingon name, Cotty?
K'hotty to you. P'taak.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
