You may be right, Jostein. It is just that in principle I should have
been able to provide full size JPGs and I don't have those for my film
images shot with FA 20. And words without images won't do much good.
Also it seems to me, that PentaxForums is somewhat digital-centristic,
so to say.
Boris
On 2/16/2011 11:13 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
Since you point out its convenience for film, perhaps you should have
included some words on performance in the gelatine world? The
"aberrations" rating would probably look quite different because of
the lens' droplet distortion towards the corners, for example. Sample
variation was also a big issue with this lens, IIRC. Especially with
regards to centering.
When I look at some of my shots, from the days of the *istD, I see
purple-green aberrations increasing towards the corners. Mine was not
perfectly centered, so it's more noticeable on the left side of the
images.
Jostein
2011/2/16 Boris Liberman<bori...@gmail.com>:
Hi!
Though PentaxForums does not seem to be in big favor here, I did participate
in the recent round of user in-depth reviews over there. So here it is: my
first published review:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax_fa_20mm_review.php
There are few misprints that I hope will be hammered out by the forum team.
Have your say. Brutal and honest is good.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
