Some folks yearn for the simpler days when much of the process was out of your hands and you didn't feel compelled to post process. This was especially true for enthusiasts who shot color. The true snapshooters (like my wife) are still perfectly happy, like being able to see the shot right after you take it, and then goes to CVS and makes prints like Ye Olde Days. I really do believe that many who reject PP simply do not want to be bothered and make up pseudo-artistic reasons to support heir lack of interest.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote: > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Franklin" > <jehosep...@mindspring.com> > Subject: Re: OT: The Myth of the Unmanipulated Image > > >> On 2011-02-17 23:59, Ken Waller wrote: >> >>>> I think the real meaning of "unmanipulated" is "snapshot". JMHO, of >>>> course. >>> >>> The unmanipulated image is exposed, un processed film or just a bunch of >>> X's & O's. >> >> For fear of being serious in a joke thread, the only unmanipluated images >> are the ones you haven't seen yet. > > So if a tree falls in the woods......... > >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> DougF (KG4LMZ) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
