Hi Paul, I wonder if you have a bad sample. I wouldn't call anything I've seen from mine embarrassingly soft or smeary.
William in Utah. "Paul F. Stregevsky" wrote: > > Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How eloquent. Why does it "suck"? > > Sorry, I forgot to answer this. > It sucks in that the results at f/2 through f/4 are so embarrassingly soft > and smeary that I won't share the pictures with anyone, even after doing > all the sharpening I dare in PhotoImpact. > > Paul Franklin Stregevsky > 13 Selby Court > Poolesville, Maryland 20837-2410 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > H (301) 349-5243 > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
