He actually mentions stacking in the video. By the looks of the DOF it must be a stack. The amazing part is he's getting usable stacks handheld because the dof is as thin as a sheet of paper. I feel lucky if I get one sharp picture from a series of 20 or 30 handheld.
On 4 March 2011 22:09, Eric Featherstone <eric.featherst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Toine's suggestion of focus stacking I'd have thought. > > Eric. > > On 4 March 2011 20:13, Jos from Holland <jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu> wrote: >> Jostein, agree with you. >> But some of the pictures in this clip have a much better than normal D.O.F. >> for a K200 sensor, as if a much smaller sensor was used, what could be the >> explanation? >> Regards, Jos >> >> On 4-3-2011 8:13, AlunFoto wrote: >>> >>> To achieve at least a nominal depth of field, you need to stop down to >>> f/11 or f/16. >>> Jostein >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Eric > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
