2011/3/11 William Robb <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com>: >> Shoots his own logic in the foot, in my opinion. >> > > How do you figure that? He used one particular measure when a measure was > specified, but he also made mention of the majority of his snow pictures > doing nothing for him. The argument could just as easily be applied to non > monetary gain activities.
Why _stop_ at monetary reward? The argument could more forcibly be applied to non-economic gains. Everyone has to pay the rent, and that's also where duty lies for most people. As a token of achiement it's loaded by more connotations than what's good for the point to come cleanly across. At least to me. To Mike's defence, monetary reward is much easier to quantify for the format of the short articles he write. There may also be a little difference of culture here, as in the classic question of whether you work to live or live to work. Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
