I usually signed with the year of the photo.... (and where shot was
taken, sometimes. )
When I embed my watermark in an image I use the year taken and year
printed/or when the digital was made - if I
have that info at hand.
The date can be important sometimes - at the least, interesting. And
essential for stock work, but thats nothing to do
with signatures per se
ann
Larry Colen wrote:
On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Why date it at all unless you're referring to a copyright date ?
Sometimes I see artwork signed with the year next to the signature.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Colen" <l...@red4est.com>
Subject: Signing and dating a print
When you sign the print of a photo, if you put a date on it, is it the date the
photo was taken, the date it was printed or the date it was signed?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
