John Sessoms wrote:
Agreed, Doug did not create the problem, but he recognized there was a
problem and did what needed to be done to get it fixed.
In fact, I think he went beyond the "extra mile", because I know he
sent personal off-list emails to some to inform them what was going on
and what he was doing about it.
Yup -- I was one... He's a keeper !
And for that, I thank him.
and I did
ann
From: Ann Sanfedele
tthanks can't be said enough... so here I am, me tooing...
But Doug should not have had to do anything at all , he didn't create
the problem...
ann the grateful
John Sessoms wrote:
> From: David Mann
>
>> On Apr 30, 2011, at 2:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>> > Doug has fixed the list, and based on what little I know,
it was
>>> anything but easy. Sorry you had to work so hard, but you can be
>>> sure that your efforts are deeply appreciated by all.
>>
>> Yes, very much so. I've occasionally had to deal with
email-related
>> problems at work. It's not something I particularly enjoy... the
>> only thing I hate more than spam filters is spam!
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
> If it doesn't include some way for the recipient to say this is *not*
> spam; this is something I want to receive, it's not a filter, it's
> censorship.
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
