On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:03 -0400, "Steven Desjardins" <drd1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> One theory I've seen is that it's aimed at the lomography types.  That
> work fit the odd combo of quality build (magnesium body) and low
> performance parts (small sensor and toy lenses).  Given the high
> emphasis on carrying the camera everywhere, the size is critical.
> Maybe the key chain idea might be real suggestion?   The price could
> also drop quickly if it doesn't sell.
> 
> Or not. I'm not planning to buy one but for some reason I find this
> weird little camera interesting.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Bob W <p...@web-options.com> wrote:
> > The M9's a bargain compared to all other cameras. Spending that much money
> > makes you a better photographer.
> >
> > B
> >
> >> Uh huh.  Leica needs for lead time for this.  Interesting though.  Is
> >> a $2000 EVIL Leica body a bargain compared to the M9?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:14 AM, David Mann <d...@multisport.net.nz>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Another voice cries out in the desert:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-
> >> photography/news/2080688/leica-launch-compact-2012
> >> >
> >> > Nice of them to give people enough notice so they can start saving.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > follow the directions.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steve Desjardins
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
> 
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to