Sounds like a good trip. Enjoy. I have to agree with Mark's decision to take the 16-50/2.8. I've never used the 21/3.2, but the 16-50 is far superior to the FA 35/2 in every respect. Plus, he has much more fov at the wide end than he would with the 21. Paul On Jun 30, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Mark Roberts <m...@robertstech.com> wrote: >> Moved into the new house just over a week ago, not even half way >> unpacked and the cat just died... Still, we're off to Ireland >> tomorrow. Two weeks of vacation, including 7 days of bicycling with >> our friends from Seattle (the same pair who biked France with us a few >> years back). This time my travel kit will consist of the K5, 16-50/2.8 >> and the 77 Limited. >> >> I'll have occasional net access so I may have a few adventures to >> report... > > Sounds like a good trip, have a great time. > > I'd differ on lenses, I think my 2006 trip to the IoM and other points > was *ist DS plus 21/3.2, 35/2 and 77/1.8, but then I don't get along > with zooms very much. I didn't have the 43 yet at that point as that > would surely have been in the kit if I did. > > I look forward to hearing and seeing the stories. :-) > -- > Godfrey > godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
