Point taken Bill, thanks - but is the aperture on these lenses wide enough?, seeing that the DOF increases with increased angles.... Of course the level of blur or 'bokeh'(i believe)is subjective, I just wanted to knoe whether it is somewhat achieveabke, say equivalent to an f4 on a 50mm, or f5.6? etc.
--- "Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michele wonders .... > > > Not having any lenses that go below 24mm, and > wanting > > to have tpossibility to blur background beyond 2-3 > > meters behind tghe subject which is close, I was > > wondring how these 2 lenses fared. > > If you get in close enough for a short focus > distance and > use a wide enough aperture, even a fisheye will go > out of > focus behind the subject. Whether such positioning > and apertures > will give the desired result can only be determined > by looking thru > the viewfinder - such an arrangment may well > produce a more > "abstract/perspective distorted" image than you may > desire. > > Bill > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the > Oregon Coast > > > http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------- > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
