Sorry to interject but as someone's already asked about this lens (which I am really interested in) I am also curious about the depth of field for FA 20 - 35 in particular, but also the 17-35.
Not having any lenses that go below 24mm, and wanting to have tpossibility to blur background beyond 2-3 meters behind tghe subject which is close, I was wondring how these 2 lenses fared. Michele --- tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4 Mar 2002 at 21:33, Mark Cassino wrote: > > > I'm thinking about buying this lens and would > appreciate any feedback > > from current or former owners of it. > > It's my favorite lens. Very sharp, excellent color > rendition, excellent contrast, good flare > resistance. > > I've had the FA 24/2 for about a month. I can't say > that it's any better at 24mm than the zoom, though I > haven't really done a head-to-head test. > > Well, I did point them both in the direction of the > sun to see how they did with flare. They seemed > about the same... > > It *is* a plastic zoom with a focus ring that isn't > very pleasant to use. > > tv > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
