On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:18 PM, William Robb wrote: > On 29/01/2012 8:46 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> On Jan 29, 2012, at 9:23 PM, William Robb wrote: >> >>> On 29/01/2012 11:42 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I would find the trend toward more technology disturbing if there were no >>>> options. >>> But since I can focus manually at will, or I can choose to use a single >>> autofocus point >>> -- with the plus of being able to choose the location of that pint -- >>> the presence of other options doesn't bother me in the least. >>> Camera makers, for the most part, aren't brain dead. They're not going to >>> take away the >>> options that many of us require. More technology is fine, since it doesn't >>> get in my way. >>>> >>> You are thinking only in your own terms, not in the terms of photography in >>> general.It's hard to discuss things with someone who only has an ego >>> centrist viewpoint, but I'll try. >> >> Ever the ass, eh Bill? Have another drink. > > I was quite sober when I wrote that, are you sober now? You seem a little > aggressive.
In assuming you were drunk, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. I would think that anyone who begins a discussion with a personal insult is either drunk or mindless. > >> >> <Egotistical nonsense snipped> >> >> > As I said, it's hard to have a discussion with someone who is so full of > themselves that all they see is what they think. > Harder still to have a discussion with someone who refuses to have a > discussion at all, unless it's to lay down their own dogma. > You'd make a good Tea Bagger. > > -- > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
