Ofcause, I do. But, I would buy a digital, high resolution camera if I could - Perhaps a Pentax 645 or even better - a Phase One (costs about 50.000 USD here) if I could. Untill then I shoot high resolution images with my Pentax 67/67II. It's very good (when ever I can find a decent lab for scanning high end scans) and MUCH more affordable than a digital MF camera. It only costs me money, when I have a paying costumer, because the camera itself is very afforable - I payed only 1000 USD for the 67II and a 55mm.
And once in a while I shoot 35 mm film for black and white shots too. Regards Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Mar 11, 2012 17:23 "Toralf Lund" <tor...@toralf.net> wrote: > On 3/10/12 16:44, JC O'Connell wrote: > > I have had my Pentax DSLR for 5 years now and only > > shot one roll of film since buying it. I am wondering > > if anyone is still using 35mm film regularly? > Yes. Although it depends a bit on how you define "regularly"; I must > admit I don't seem shoot much in general these days. It's partly due > to > lack of time, but I suppose mostly lack of imagination and/or > inspiration. Still, I did manage something like 20 rolls last year - > most 35mm, but also a number of 120. Got an old beat-up Rolleiflex, > plus > I think I took the Holga for a spin once or twice, too. > > I still can get slide film developed a couple of places in the area, > by > the way... > > - T > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
