I can say the MZ-3 does a very good job in low light and consistantly gets me sharp photos of performers in nightclubs. I have been there with other photographers that used canon, nikon nad minolta systems and in comparison it is equal or better than the similar priced models. This is with the spot beam on th AF500 at times and yes I have thought some photos would be out of focus just to be surprised when they turned out to be in foucs on the print. I also noticed that some lenses are just plain dogs AF speed wise ( 28-80, sigma 70-300 ) while others are much faster like the sigma 28-105 IF and toikna 400 ATX ( which focuses faster than the F 50mm F1.7 )
--- Bruce Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a ZX-5 (Actually still do, my 9 year old uses > it like a MZ - no AF). The > N80 is a bit better, but still limited by the AF > motor. The F100 is a whole > 'nuther ballgame. If I know I'm going to need fast > AF, or the light is low I > don't use the N80 so I don't run up against its > limits as often as I did with > the ZX. > > --- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday, March 11, 2002, at 08:56 AM, Pål Audun > Jensen wrote: > > Perhaps Bruce can enlighten us about the details > of his head to head > > with the Z-1p and 28-105 vs. the Nikon body he > used and Nikkor 28-105. > > > > -Aaron > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free > email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . > ______________________________________________________________________ Find, Connect, Date! http://personals.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
