The best camera must be the 41MP Nokia - most MP per buck ;) Alex
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: > The 645D is a 40MP camera. The D800/E is a 36MP camera. Cost per MP > calculation: > > 645D is $250/MP > 800E is $92/MP > (K-5 is $62.50/MP if priced at $1000) > > In those terms, the 800E is delivering a lot of bang for the buck and > there's a full compliment of AF lenses available. > > The D800E has 90% of the resolution of a 645D yet the cost is only 1/3 > that of a 645D. The K-5 has about 48.5% the resolution of the D800E > and the cost is slightly less than 1/3 that of a D800E. Both the D800E > and K-5 offer significant bang for the buck. > > I agree with your rationale on the K-5, It's why I continued to buy > Pentax after Pentax, K-mount after K-mount. On the other hand many > people will find themselves scrounging for, or purchasing new FF > lenses in K-mount, were Pentax to come out with a FF body. Using only > legacy non-AF lenses or APS-C lenses on such a body would negate many > of the potential benefits. > > Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
