Judging from the rumoured spec I would say that K30 pretty much replaces
K-5 whereupon K-5's successor has to be somewhat massive, may be even
full frame. At least this is what I personally would find logical from
technical point of view.
On 5/21/2012 19:51, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Charles Robinson<charl...@visi.com>
wrote:
I wonder what the downside(s) would be. For starters, it doesn't
look like the mode dial on top has a lock. And I'm not sure there
is an LCD display on the top... but what other things appear to be
missing?
I just started making a list. I welcome additions. It's based on
this leaked set of specifications: http://stdw.us/J8KF5j
K-30 relative to K-5:
+ video improvements (H.264, frame rates, etc.) + focus peaking +
mysterious AF improvements ("i" in SAFOX version number) + AA battery
support
- ISO 51200 (K-30 = 25600) - top LCD - no 1/8000 shutter (K-30 =
1/6000) - slower FPS (but only slightly, 6 FPS, not 4 FPS as
previously leaked) - 14 bit ADC? (guess based on re-using the K-01
sensor& processor)
TBD: AF fine tuning, full IS capabilities (sensor shift for
composition adjustment, rotation axis, O-GPS1 astrotracer support),
intervalometer, level, quietness... what else?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
