I have a 1 year old Nature Trekker AW, that coincidentally I am thinking of selling as it's too big for what I need. In my opinion you would need to be lugging a *lot* of gear to need a photo trekker, they are massive, and also not very light (nor is the Nature Trekker). They are very nicely made packs and comfortable to wear. My only criticism is that they are not lightweight, however this is in comparison to regular backpacks I think that the camera padding adds a lot of weight. From memory I think the nature trekker is about 6 lbs. HTH
If you decide you might be interested in a Nature Trekker (It's black and been used only about 6 times), then give me a shout. Regards, /\/\ick... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Camera backpacks I am in the market for a new backpack for my 6x7 gear, as I have outgrown my previous camera bag. I am looking at the following backpacks from LowePro: Super Trekker AW Pro Trekker AW Photo Trekker AW Photo Trekker Classic. I am wondering if anyone has used any of these backpacks and can comment, either favourably or otherwise. The pack will have to carry a 6x7 body with meter prism and 7 lenses, plus filters and other dreck. Thanks William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
