Very interesting craft. It really sounds to be more than capable on both land and water. You said it's expensive so I have to say I was surprised when I saw the price - much lower than I expected.
I'll never get one. Even if I could afford one they're just not my thing. I wonder though, how loud are they? Jet Skis and other PWCs are very loud (I suspect they're louder at shore than the operators realize). When I'm walking around the wildlife park at the bottom of my street they are loud enough to be disturbing, especially when they are close to shore (as so often seems to ve the case). I hope hope the craft you reviewed are a bit quieter, although if they go 40 mph I can't imagine they would be. Cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> Sent: October 14, 2012 10/14/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Subject: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water I mentioned how much fun it was driving this thing a while back. Embargo is off today, and my article is in the Times and on the web. The machine is called a Quadski, and it's a hoot, an expensive hoot, but a hoot. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/14/automobiles/after-romping-in-mud-you-can-take-it-for-a-bath.html?ref=automobiles -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.