PJ wrote: > > I've just skimmed it and it just goes to prove that there's really > nothing new. > > On 12/27/2012 11:02 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote: >> Tom, I was reading it yesterday, and couldn't get it from the first >> quick reading, but got distracted. When I read it the second time, I >> still couldn't get what was new in it. >> >> Igor
Guys, where did I say there was anything new in it? I said it was interesting. To me it was particularly interesting because I've been more or less a propenent of higher MP cameras, at least for what I do, and this supports that. Not owning or having used tilt and shift lenses, I've always viewed them as largely for perspective control in architectural photography. I'd reckon only a small % of the PDML have used tilt/shift lenses baecause they're costly, and an even far smaller % in the manner discussed, to approximate large format film. When did posting something new become a pre-requisite? Why do I feel I'm having to offer justification for sharing information on the PDML???? Also this short article had e-a-s-y t-o u-n-d-e-r-s-t-a-n-d s-e-n-t-e-n-c-e-s, along with p-i-c-t-u-r-e-s, something beneficial for PDML members. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
