Thu Dec 27 12:22:49 EST 2012 Tom C wrote:
> PJ wrote: > > > > > I've just skimmed it and it just goes to prove that there's really > > nothing new. > > > > On 12/27/2012 11:02 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote: > >> Tom, I was reading it yesterday, and couldn't get it from the first > >> quick reading, but got distracted. When I read it the second time, I > >> still couldn't get what was new in it. > >> > >> Igor > > Guys, where did I say there was anything new in it? > > I said it was interesting. To me it was particularly interesting > because I've been more or less a propenent of higher MP cameras, at > least for what I do, and this supports that. Not owning or having used > tilt and shift lenses, I've always viewed them as largely for > perspective control in architectural photography. > > I'd reckon only a small % of the PDML have used tilt/shift lenses > baecause they're costly, and an even far smaller % in the manner > discussed, to approximate large format film. > > When did posting something new become a pre-requisite? Why do I feel > I'm having to offer justification for sharing information on the > PDML???? > > Also this short article had e-a-s-y t-o u-n-d-e-r-s-t-a-n-d > s-e-n-t-e-n-c-e-s, along with p-i-c-t-u-r-e-s, something beneficial > for PDML members. > > Tom C. > Tom, I didn't mean to criticize you for your posting. Rather, I was providing my impression of the article. I am used to consider dpreview website as a site with news (new product announcements, reviews, etc), i.e. the website where I am hearing about something new. Hence, probably, my reaction. The irony is that upon the first brief reading, I thought it was written rather heavily and not very clearly, since I had difficulty grasping/finding what was new in it. Cheers, Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
