On Jan 30, 2013, at 20:27 , Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote: > I agree with you completely. While the K-7 is limited Iif I ever broke or > lost my K-5 I could get by for a while with the K-7. Maybe not so for folks > who use high ISO. I do wonder how it would do converted to IR. Never thought > about having the AI filter removed.... >
(shudder) I just pictured having to "go back" to the K10D (which my son now uses). Nooooooooo! My daughter has the K200D which I got as a replacement (lemon-law, 3 strikes you're out) for a defective-after-1.5-years ist-DS. I've never used it. But I don't want to. The only non-Pentax user in our family is my wife. Maybe SHE can learn to use/love the K7? -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
