I think the sweet spot for most photographers in a FF camera would be
24mp with 14bit color depth and at least the same capabilities of the
K-5II in most other respects. I think if Pentax managed to put that into
either a K-5 sized body or a MZ-S style body, and managed to actually
market the damned thing for a change, it would be a winner. However I
don't expect anyone to actually listen to me.
On 2/4/2013 9:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Darren Addy wrote:
Suggested reading:
http://www.bythom.com/nikond800review.htm
Particularly the section entitled: "Resolution, Diffraction, and To E
or Not to E"
His entire article seems to be based on resolution, which is only one
possible reason for buying the camera. I'm much more interested in the
subtle tonal gradation Mike Johnston's been writing about, especially
as it seems to be particularly advantageous in B&W work.
Quite frankly, I'm satisfied with 24 megapixels in full-frame. But if
the D800 did in-body image stabilization I'd probably have bought one
by now, regardless.
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/11/nikon-d800-and-d800e-review.html
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/11/delighted-by-photo-ninja.html
--
Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds in
the bank account).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
