My 16-45 has been seldom used, but was noted on an image I recently posted. I don't think anyone believed I ever took my DA 55~300 off the camera. It obviously was a reach that was short of a connection. IOW, my image was so bad, it must be at least partially due to the 16-45. If you ever "get it" you'll likely grin.
Jack ;-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Cakalic <caka...@gmail.com> To: pdml@pdml.net Cc: Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 10:54 AM Subject: Re: FS Friday - SMC Pentax DA 16-45mm F4 ED AL Zoom > Tom, > Did you decide to sell this after you saw my last post; "Township Shed ?" > I know I just teed one up for you, but I think you're better than that. > I'm ducking now. > > Jack ;-))) I must have missed something because I don't get the joke. :) Tom -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
