I think the K-500 sounds like a terrific upgrade for you and I think the main benefit of the K-50 is really the weather sealing. Personally, I hate the looks of the K-30 and have heard some people don't care for its ergonomics (normally a Pentax advantage).
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Thomas Bohn <tho...@bohnomat.de> wrote: > Hello, > > currently I use an K-m, which is nice but the auto focus of that camera is > annoying. So I think it is time to think about something new. > > For me there are a few options. > > 1st, I get the new K-500, which should be a nice upgrade to my K-m. And > should be cheap to get. > > 2nd, I get an K-50, has some enhancements to the K-500 like an electronic > level but it is more expensive. > > 3rd, I get a K-30, it should be cheaper now and the difference to the K-50 > seems minimal for my taste. > > My plan is actually to get rid of most of my equipment, I have not used my > flash for while, I don't use my Kit lense and only my tripod is sometimes > useful. > > So I really just need a body to go with my 35 mm prime lense. > > What do you think? > > Thomas > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- "Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" - Peter Galassi -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
