On 23 Jun 2013, at 21:36, "Daniel J. Matyola" <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry if you find the ads on Photo.Net such a problem. > > Not all services are equal. The flexibility of Photo.Net makes it > worth the minor convenience of the ads, in my view. One click, and > they are gone. I prefer that to the strange interface used by most of > the alternatives. Photo.Net offers a lot of storage, a lot of > flexibility, and ease of use. Millions of visitors manage to visit > the site and look ate the images despite the minor inconvenience of > the ads. > One click and I'm gone. It's up to you if you want your convenience to be at the expense of your potential viewers, but I think that's a lousy attitude. You've suggested that we should subscribe to photo.net if we don't want to see ads. Do you seriously think people are going to subscribe to every website that shows annoying ads annoyingly? Do you subscribe to them all? No, people are just going to leave those sites. One of the basic rules of web design is don't piss off your customers. As for your millions of visitors, if you scale up the number of people on this list who've complained a great many times about photo.net you may get some sense of how much annoyance those ads cause to people. And if you scale up similarly the number of people on this list who use that 'one click' to leave your site rather than look at your pictures when an ad gets in the way, you'll get some idea of how many viewers photo.net is driving away. B > > > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Bob W <p...@web-options.com> wrote: >> On 23 Jun 2013, at 19:58, "Daniel J. Matyola" <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I don't see the ads, probabley because I subscribe to Photo.Net. >>> >>> Remember, if you don't pay for a service, you are the product being sold. >> >> You are not obliged to subscribe to a service that uses ads. I pay for a >> website and it does not thrust ads in people's faces just because they >> haven't also subscribed. I think it's rude of people to use websites that do >> that, and photo.net et al should have the decency not to serve ads at all >> through subscribers' pages. >> >> If I were you I'd be very unhappy about that because you're paying photo.net >> to host your pictures, yet their stupid ads are driving viewers away from >> them, and nobody gains. >> >> B >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
