On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Bob Sullivan <rf.sulli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Igor, > It's purely subjective and I am still filling thumbnails with images, > but is does seem a bit slower. > Regards, Bob S.
Have not really noticed any slowness in ver 4 over vers 3, but i'm glad i did the upgred to 4. Not going to do vers 5, the guy at Henry's that teaches LR and PS said there was not enough in the upgrade department to warrant it, plus i need to upgrade my OS and i have never had to do that, and quite frankly it scares the crap out of me even to think about doing it let alone do it. Dave > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org> wrote: >> >> I feel your pain, Larry. >> I bought 4.x but didn't install it because I need to do some processing >> on a WinXP computer. >> Reports of 4.x being slower than 3.6 also did not encourage me for the >> upgrade. >> So, I am still stuck on 3.6. >> >> Somebody here, on PDML, mentioned that 5.x offers some performance >> improvement >> over 4.x. I wonder how much is that, - is the speed and responsiveness >> back to the level of 3.x? >> >> On LR facebook page, I see some people complaining about performance >> issues and memory management.. I don't know how much of that is >> subjective: >> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151668726263464&set=a.117703788463.98904.5850453463&type=1 >> >> >> Igor >> >> >> Fri Jun 21 22:20:51 EDT 2013 >> Larry Colen wrote: >> >> Unfortunately, for me it would cost about $2,000 to upgrade lightroom. It >> won't run on a flavor of OSX that will run on my computer. >> >> Eric Weir <eeweir at bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>On Jun 21, 2013, at 12:00 PM, George Sinos <gsinos at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> For me, the new process engine was enough reason to upgrade to 4. >>>the >>>> speed increase and healing brush were enough reasons to upgrade to 5. >>>> The healing brush eliminates a need to jump to photoshop and back. >>>> >>>> All of the other improvements were frosting on the cake. >>>> >>>> At $79, it's likely to be the least expensive purchase that will >>>> actually help you improve your photos and reduce your post processing >>>> time. >>> >>>Thanks, George. I didn't know the reasons, but I assumed that the >>>answer would be that I should. >>> >>>And thanks to Bob, too. >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>Eric Weir >>>Decatur, GA USA >>>eeweir at bellsouth.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
