On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:38:54PM -0600, steve harley wrote: > on 2013-09-20 12:18 Larry Colen wrote > >5) Meanwhile, several people on the list will buy it, and while it > >won't be perfect, they will decide that it is a significant improvement > >in usability over the K-5. > > it would have to be a major improvement in usability (or maybe > dynamic range/high iso) to perk my interest; more pixels i don't > need; for my limited use of AF, K-5 is good enough for me; dual card > slots aren't a big deal for me
That would be: 3) The new features it has are not the ones I want. Pentax is doomed. > > but Pentax doesn't really need me, they need new customers, so it's > probably most important how it will appeal to people who haven't > already got a K-5-level camera Yup, they're doomed all right. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
