Godders -thanks for the reminders. Re sensor crop vs DoF - D'OH!!! Of
course. Hey my excuse is my back is bad and I'm in pain - addling my brain.

Thanks so much for that. I will do some further testing and might even
make my own set of distance markings... now where is my Dremel bwahahahahah.





On 3/10/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:

>One factor:
>
>Many of the less expensive mount adapters allow the lens to focus "past
>infinity", an inexpensive way to ensure that all lenses CAN focus to
>infinity by making the adapter+camera registration just a little shorter
>than nominal. The idea seems to be that since most users are likely to
>be looking TTL anyway with adapted lenses, they can set the focus
>accurately, and who cares what the focusing distance scale actually reads? 
>
>This is annoying and confusing for those (like me) who like to use the
>DoF markings on the distance scales. The ONLY third-party mount adapters
>that are rigorously maintaining the proper mount register, in my
>experience with about eight different vendors' products, are Novoflex,
>Voigtländer, and Rayqual. 
>
>Another factor: 
>
>Remember that the DoF markings on the lens barrel for most "legacy" or
>"manual" lenses was designed to be used with 35mm film camera format,
>24x36 mm. Your Fuji, like my Ricoh, is 16x24mm format, which is cropping
>the original field of view and implicitly adding more magnification.
>More magnification == less DoF, so the markings are off. The
>magnification or crop factor for your Fuji is 1.5x, so a first order
>approximation to adjust the DoF markings is to use the set of markings
>for a one stop larger opening than what you set on the lens. That is, if
>you set the lens for 10' focus distance, and set f/8, the actual DoF
>range to include infinity will set the infinity mark at the far f/5.6
>setting. Presuming, of course, that the distance scale index is accurate
>(meaning that the mount register is correct). 
>
>A combination of these two factors is likely the cause of your
>observations. To solve the problem:
>
>- calibrate the distance scale index so you know where the true
>registration mark on the focusing ring should be.
>
>- for zone focus, use one-stop larger markings than the actual aperture
>you set.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__    Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |    Web Video Production
----------    <www.seeingeye.tv>
_____________________________



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to