Chris Mitchell <chris.mitch...@which.net> wrote: >On 5 November 2013 14:21, Dario Bonazza <dario.bona...@virgilio.it> wrote: >> Am I the only one thinking the Df is way too complicated for being the >> camera it pretends to be? >> Dario >> >Me too. The top looks beyond retro - the design brief of "put >everything on clicky dials that you can" has been followed to the >extreme and the back looks more like a DSLR than any DSLR that went >before it. All those buttons! Neither one thing nor the other. > >Glad I don't have any legacy Nikon lenses.
For once I find Thom Hogan's analysis on the money. He sums up the plusses and minuses pretty well. He notes conflicts/ambiguities between the retro-style controls and the electronic ones. Favorite quote: "The Df very well may be the first camera marketed and sold to the AARP crowd." http://www.dslrbodies.com/newsviews/digital-confusion-with-the.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
