On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:29:21PM -0500, John wrote: > On 12/12/2013 10:43 PM, Peter Loveday wrote: > >>http://sam-haskins.tumblr.com/image/34125592632 > > > >Damn, look at that grain! > > > >Pentax must've really used some terrible sensors back in the '60s. > > > >- Peter > > > > > > You could easily switch to one that suited your taste better.
But they were only single use. At one point I was wondering what it would take to use film as archival storage of digital photo data. What sort of data density could you get on something like microfilm? It would certainly last longer than DVDs or spinny drives. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
