On 13 Dec 2013, at 14:43, John <johnsess...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 12/12/2013 11:36 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:29:21PM -0500, John wrote: >>> On 12/12/2013 10:43 PM, Peter Loveday wrote: >>>>> http://sam-haskins.tumblr.com/image/34125592632 >>>> >>>> Damn, look at that grain! >>>> >>>> Pentax must've really used some terrible sensors back in the '60s. >>>> >>>> - Peter >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You could easily switch to one that suited your taste better. >> >> But they were only single use. >> >> At one point I was wondering what it would take to use film as >> archival storage of digital photo data. What sort of data density >> could you get on something like microfilm? It would certainly last >> longer than DVDs or spinny drives. >> > > For long term post-apocalyptic data storage density, I don't think you > can beat microfiche.
I've had all mine encoded on cockroaches' wings. B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
