Paul via phone
> On Jan 1, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 01/01/2014 5:44 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: >> And the M35/2 or A35/2. The K35/2 is a bit bulky and I don't have a FA35/2. > > I like the A35/2. It's beguilingly compact, and takes nice clear pictures. > I've heard it is fairly rare as well. I can't believe you don't have the > FA35/2. It has nice glass, but I don't like the build so much, though it does > seem sturdier than it feel like it should be. > It looks wimpy, but it's a good lens. Fine adjustment of autofocus is a must do with this one. But it will reward you. Paul > I should use my FA35/2 sometime. It's funny, I remembered buying one, but I > didn't have a clue as to it's whereabouts. It turns out it was still in the > box. I just found it a couple of weeks ago. I don't recall how long ago I > bought it, probably shortly after the istD. I would have had no need for any > AF lenses before that, and would have wanted an AF standard right after. > > bill > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
