"frank theriault" writes:
>'Twas me. Here are a couple of our current auctions. This is one of my
>sister's images:
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=857729190
>Here's one of mine:
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=856373380
I'm curious, why 5x7s and 4x6s? That's pretty much snapshot size,
regardless of the mat. The images are strong enough to support being
larger, and larger would work better for a wall-hung viewing distance in
most houses.
Perhaps I've just being too judgemental, but a 5x7 (or worse, a 4x6) sounds
like you just took a print you got back from a one-hour lab off a roll of
snapshots from your latest trip and matted it. The images themselves are
too good for that to be an accurate impression, hence my question.
thanks,
patbob ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
