Quoting Steve Cottrell <co...@seeingeye.tv>:
On 13/4/14, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
? To be able to use existing full-frame lenses
? To have access to smaller/lighter (and Med format) lenses
? To be able to use lenses for the full-frame on both full-frame and
APS-C bodies
? To avoid needing to buy expensive full-frame glass
? To have a *vastly* wider selection of lenses available (fisheye,
ultra-wide and super telephoto)
? To be able to use affordable lenses on occasion
? To have the option of third-party glass
? To have in-body image stabilization
? To have smaller/lighter kit than medium format
? For faster frame rate when necessary
To watch me dine on cloth.
I thought you were adopting the Ricoh exclusion clause (ie. any full
frame camera will be a Ricoh, not a true Pentax, therefore the
original premise is null and void).
I'll argue your case for a modest fee...
--
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
