Paul Stenquist wrote:

>Drag racing starts are based on anticipation. A yellow light precedes the 
>green 
>and the drivers time their reaction based on that light. It’s said that if you 
>see green, you’ve lost. There are occasional zero reaction times, and of 
>course 
>there are fouls. In other words, a .006 reaction time isn’t really a .006 
>reaction 
>but it’s darn good timing.

Yep. In Olympic track events you're not allowed to anticipate the
start. Anything less than – I think – 0.2 sec is assumed to be
anticipating the start. This causes a false start and everyone has to
go back to the starting blocks. Anyone who causes more than one false
start is disqualified. The whole business can make short events like
the 100 meters a bit aggravating (sprinters are naturally pretty wired
people). IMHO they should just allow anticipated starts as long as
they don't actually precede the gun and use the runner's actual time
from leaving the blocks (they have sensors in the blocks to catch
this) to crossing the line. It's technologically feasible to do this
with great accuracy now. I suppose it's theoretically possible under
such a system that the first runner across the line might not be the
winner, but this would have to be extraordinarily rare and pretty much
invisible to human observers.
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to