A skylight or other warming filter is going to mess up all of the
white balance presets and waste a tiny bit of light.  These are color
correction and they make no sense on a digital camera with adjustable
white balance; they were designed to be used with daylight film under
non-daylight (shade, etc.) lighting.

UV will do no harm relative to a clear filter, but no good either,
since normal cameras are not sensitive to UV anyway.

Personally I like the Marumi Super DHG clear protective filters
(available from 2filter.com); they have a hydrophobic coating so you
don't have to give up the water-shedding properties of the WR and DA*
lenses if you want to use a filter, and the quality seems very nice
for the money.  I suspect that the coating is similar to the one
tested here (which is a UV filter that I have not seen for sale in the
US): 
http://www.lenstip.com/113.22-article-UV_filters_test_Marumi_77_mm_WPC_UV.html

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <godd...@me.com> wrote:
> Skylight 1a, 1b etc are warming filters designed to reduce the influence of 
> open, blue sky light on skin tones with color slide film. UV or Haze filters 
> absorb ultraviolet light which contributes to haze from atmospheric scatter 
> when using older B&W films that are overly UV-blue sensitive.
>
> Neither is needed for digital capture. Neither influences digital sensors 
> much: white balance obviates the need for warming filters, and sensors are 
> not particularly sensitive to UV.
>
> For occasional protection use when working in dusty, muddy, or other 
> physically abusive circumstances, a clear, multicoated protective glass 
> filter is best.
>
> Godfrey
>
>
>> On May 6, 2014, at 8:09 AM, David J Brooks <pentko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> One of the several reasons i wanted to get the Pentax 17-70 was its
>> filter size. I have a number of 67mm filters and did not have to add
>> to the lot. Although the Sigma is a much nicer lens IMO even with the
>> reverse zoom, buit its a 72 mm filter. The salesman asked if i needed
>> protection, and i told him no need i did not want any more children
>> <ba dum>
>> I said i'm sure i have a 72 filter some were, ( opps they are 77mm)
>> and he said if not come back and he'll set me up, "JUST DON'T GET A
>> SKYLIGHT" he said. I did not ask him why he thought that way, but then
>> it started to think about it.
>>
>> Why not a skylight for protection, is the UV1 better suited,??
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to