You just described what png should have been except that it became a
bloated misbegotten camel from a committee trying to design a horse.
On 5/15/2014 1:06 PM, John wrote:
There needs to be a file format that would be just like JPEG but
without the lossy compression?
Get it to the size you want before saving in that format and then even
if the "client" re-sized it & saved it over and over again it wouldn't
lose quality.
On 5/14/2014 5:18 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
It really is discouraging, I shot a couple of publicity photos, gratis,
for a volunteer organization. I processed them each to a good looking
jpeg, and sent them off to the secretary of said organization, for their
use. I received back a copy of their electronic newsletter and the
photos had been re-compressed and re-sized until all the quality had
been wrung out of it, like so much dirty dishwater. I used to work for
small newspapers, so I shouldn't be so depressed over this, but, somehow
I still am.
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
