Or, for us true pedants, "neither has/neither is" On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:25:21PM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > My pet peeve as well, Igor - Alas, it seems that "less" has been taking > over and i'm told by an editor friend that it is now considered acceptable > usage. My other one is the "both don't have/are not" in place of "neither > have/neither are" > > sigh > ann > > On 6/2/2014 12:59, Igor Roshchin wrote: > > > > > >It has been discussed many times in many venues that the correct usage is > >"10 items or FEWER" vs "10 items or less" (and apparently there is no > >complete consensus, even though I am on the "fewer" side in this case). > > > >But in this case, the situation is worse: > >"UP TO .. or LESS"... > > > >http://42graphy.org/snapshots/IMG_20140523_212839_018-scr.jpg > >"Some people are not paid to think." > > > >(Seen in Victoria's [BC] Save-On-Foods.) > > > >Igor > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.