Neat! With more contrast #3 would be a great abstract shot.

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
> Interesting results - there is the noise but there is also an altered
> tonality. I like 4734_1 .
>
> Mark
>
> On 11/7/2014 1:44 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone:
>>
>> On the way to Newberry Library the other night, I tried a few high ISO
>> shots at 51,200—and in some cases added a bit of flash, which was dialed
>> down to EV -2.00. The metadata is listed above each photo.
>>
>> There are five images here--(virtually as shot)— with a tarted up version
>> that follows to make for a total of 10 images.  Clearly, there is noise, but
>> I have to say, I was still surprised with the quality given the ISO.  I plan
>> to do more experimentation—kind of fun.
>>
>> http://www.caguila.com/highiso/index.html
>>
>> Cheers, Christine
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to