I don't have Stan's collected comments in front of me, so mine may overlap. 
I should add that I'm becoming a fan of using in-between focal lengths 
(like 30 or 31) to replace a pair (28 and 35):

 From Pentax catalog: "The perfect solution for those trying to choose 
between the 35 and 28mm focal lengths. Light weight and ample lens speed." 
Tong Xu: "I recently conducted resolution tests between the K35/2.0, the 
A35/2.0, and the K30/2.8. The 30/2.8 is amazing. It outperforms the 35 2.0s 
at every respect. The K beat the A in center resolution at all f/stops, and 
tied it for corner resolution." (Results in Paul's file under 35 mm focal 
length.) Yoshi: "Hama's rectangular hood (52mm) is the best hood I have 
ever seen for K28/3.5, K24/2.8, K28/2, K30/2.8, K35/2, and K35/3.5 in my 
experience." Yoshihiko Takinami - . . .excellent optically; well corrected 
aberrations, very few distortion, very high actual/visual resolution, good 
color rendition. . .Yoshi: "I love this lens.  :^) I like K30/2.8 better 
than any 28mm lens Pentax ever made. It's compact in size and very well 
built. > How about optical qualities: resolution, contrast, color, 
distortion, > bokeh, light fall-off, etc.? It has great resolving power 
visually/actually, excellent contrast and good color 
rendition.   Distortion and light fall-off seem very slight, and its bokeh 
is really good.
I have placed a sample photo taken with this lens at 
<http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/gallery01/p&f0004.html> It was 
dim, cloudy morning I take that photo.   The lens rendered the scene with 
quite impressive contrast and color, IMO. Yoshihiko Takinami

Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to