Quoting Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net>:
You would have paid a steep price
for my copy of the DA16-45, Eric!
Good choice!
Yes - hard to find anything bad to say about it. My only regret is
that I don't use it as often since I got the 18-135. I've just become
more lazy as I get older...
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
J
Sent from my iPhone
On May 30, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:
The 16-45 is an outstanding value. It shoots much better than it
looks or feels. You will like it.
Paul via phone
On May 30, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
I'm sure you'll be happy with your selection, Eric - it's an
excellent lens.
Mark
On 5/30/2015 2:58 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On May 16, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Eric Weir <eew...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Thanks again to all who responded to my request for input
regarding wide angle zooms. FWIW,regarding them, I’m leaning
toward the pentax 16-45/4 or the new sigma 17-40/2.8. The latter
is especially attractive, though more expensive, but within my
range.
I ended up getting the pentax 16-45/4, primarily because it is
available used inexpensively. My preference would have been the
sigma 17-40/2.8. It may become an option down the road.
Thanks again for all who responded to my request for input.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
