>>If this happens, I'll eat my hat.<< Don't rush into it, Darren. Cotty may want company.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:58 AM, John <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh, and following one of the other links, the new "super-resolution" >> pixel/sensor shift technology that's supposed to debut with it may >> filter down to some current cameras via a firmware update. > > If this happens, I'll eat my hat. > > The only one that it is even possible to filter down to is the K-3, > since they share the same sensor and thus the same amount of pixel > shift in both directions. However, the K-3II is supposed to have a > more robust SR ("motor") system that I would imagine was necessary for > either the pixel-shift or the longitivity of the SR system. Any > firmware update requires programmers and would imagine that any fix > that was so sensor dependent would not be the kind of fix upon which a > company could prudently spend the resources - particularly when there > are new models that need the attention. > -- > Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
