On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:04 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote:

> What advantage does having a backside-illuminated sensor bring to the table?

Imaging sensors are made of semiconductors, like computer chips. Part
of the semiconductor material is used to capture photons of light and
convert the light into electrons. Those electrons are then counted to
tell you how bright each pixel is. The circuitry that reads out the
pixel values is also part of the semiconductor.

In a traditional "front-side illuminated" sensor, the light has to go
through the circuitry layer before getting to the part that captures
it to turn it into electrons. Some of the light is uselessly absorbed
in that circuitry layer. This sounds stupid, but I guess it's the
easiest way to build the sensors.

In a backside illuminated sensor, things are turned around so the
light hits the light-collecting layer without going through the
circuitry layer. This can result in a substantial improvement in the
amount of light successfully recorded.

BSI sensors started out in small sensors, like cell phone cameras, and
now we're seeing the first APS-C and FF sized ones. (They've also been
used in research-grade instruments for decades.)

BTW, the human eye is frontside-illuminated, and the squid eye is
backside-illuminated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cephalopod_eye

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to